TrueRQ.ai

TRUERQ · TRUST & TRANSPARENCY

Explainable personal suitability

The TrueRQ Score is being developed. It will express how well an option fits your stated priorities, with the criteria and weights visible. The score shown on the homepage is a worked example of the approach with fictional ratings; the score card in the workspace is a placeholder until the model ships.

Start with your priorities

The intended TrueRQ Score expresses how well an option fits a person’s stated requirements, using criteria such as budget, schools, commute, layout and lifestyle needs, with weights the person can see and change.

The homepage demonstration

The homepage uses four fictional criteria ratings out of 100. Townhouse: budget 85, schools 95, commute 60, space 95. Apartment: budget 80, schools 65, commute 95, space 65. Each slider sets a relative importance from 1 to 10. The displayed score is the rounded sum of rating × weight, divided by the sum of weights. The displayed percentage weights are rounded separately.

What the example proves

Changing what matters changes the comparison. The numbers demonstrate the calculation only; they do not describe real properties.

What a production score must show

Source dates, criteria explanations, meaningful trade-offs and information gaps. Missing information must not silently count as a zero or as a positive. The treatment of missing data, confidence measures and validation are part of the model that is still being built; the workspace shows a placeholder card until it is ready.

Suitability is not value

Personal suitability is distinct from property valuation, developer reliability, investment risk and expected returns. Those need their own evidence and methods, and the score will not claim them.

Questions

Email uday@udai.ai.